Income Inequality And The $19 Billion WhatsApp Deal


The recent news cycle has been dominated by two very different stories that fascinate us: Facebook’s eye-popping, $19 billion deal for WhatsApp and the Obama administration’s growing concern about income inequality.

How can these seemingly disparate points-of-view reconcile each other?


Through the Pareto Efficiency Criteria, a well-respected economic theory about optimal economic growth.


A Rising Tide
The Pareto Efficiency Criteria states that as long as economic growth happens without hurting others, it’s good for an economy.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, in particular, this concept is a hot topic. The explosion of IPO-driven wealth largely from tech entrepreneurs is creating an economic boom in the region.

Some, though, argue there’s a downside. Prices for everything are higher. No doubt, there’s some truth to that, but there’s also the undeniable fact that when money is flowing, people spend more – a lot more. That does help everyone.

To continue to be the land of opportunity, our country needs to recognize the tremendous economic and societal benefits that flow from entrepreneurial individuals and companies.


Avoiding The Dark Side
Most people are not bothered by entrepreneurs who create things like WhatsApp or Facebook. Nor are they miffed by professional athletes or entertainers who come into wealth and fame because of their talent.

What bothers the President – and many other Americans – is the following:
·         Wealth created by corporate executives through outsized pay packages, especially when compared to the stagnant wages of the average corporate employee.

·         Wealth generated by Wall Street professionals who were rewarded for taking risks that caused the financial crisis.

Where Do We Go From Here
So how do we continue to promote the benefits of entrepreneurship without exacerbating income inequality?

First, let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water. America’s entrepreneurial spirit is the source of its success and is the envy of the world. Innovation will continue to improve our standard of living and propel economic growth.

Second, we need sensible government regulation.  Implemented correctly, Dodd-Frank can help prevent the excesses that led to the financial crisis.  

Third, while regulations are needed in the financial services industry, we need to limit the regulations on small business.  The JOBS Act was a great start, but we can do more.

For its part, the wealth management industry needs to focus on the innovators and entrepreneurial wealth creators. 

The industry should also think carefully about pursuing corporate chieftains and financial services professionals. Their earnings might be in long-term jeopardy because of regulatory scrutiny and public disapproval.

One of the oldest and wisest investing strategies is, “Don’t fight the Fed.” In the same vein, it’s probably smart not to fight the Oval Office when it comes to income inequality.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Inorganic

Image
Our industry has always looked down on Wall Street’s recruiting checks.  Last week there were numerous announcements that independent firms were offering advisors money to purchase their practice.  The term for these transactions is inorganic growth.  This week we will look at why these transactions are the new rage and examine if they are better than the old Wall Street checks. Wempy Popeye and financial advisors fall for the “I’ll gladly pay pay you tomorrow for a Hamburger today” pitch.  Unfortunately Popeye and and most financial advisors provide their hamburger but seldomly get paid what the firms and Wimpy promise .  Why?  The advisors need the cash and Popeye is gullible.  On Wall Street the deals adjusted when the advisors changed firms looking for a new deal every five to eight years.  The recent Luminous departure shows that the advisory contracts need to be adjusted.  The new contracts are written by experienced firms and lawyers to prevent serial departures. 
Read more

Stop Judging

Image
I have known that I have MS for over four years.  My doctors believe I have had MS for over twenty years.  Initially, When I received this diagnosis  I was very opinionated when I saw disable people. I assumed the worst. As a currently disabled person I can educate and warn you regarding things you shouldn’t say to me or disabled people..  This blog will educate on my disability. The places it manifests itself and how you can react and support me and other disabled people. The three items are: 1.) Needing a walker 2.) Government disability  3.) Falling MS causes me to loose my balance and fall.  The walker prevents this reality  I look at walkers as being as sign of old age,  I was incorrect and a good walker is an aid!  With a walker I fall less often.  I might look old, but I am OLD! Our government provides support to the millions of MS patients in the US.  Support is through Social Security and must be approved.  I am approved. The service can be cancelled if i get a full time job.
Read more

Summer Changes

Image
  Our summer is almost over,  What did we learn during all of our downtime?   I will summarize all of my observations and share my plans on what I will implement when I return to my office.  I discovered/ learned 6 items on my beech lounging, morning walks and social media tolling that I’ll share.  Hope they help.  My first and easiest change was my eye glasses.  Many of my friend asked it was trying to look like Elton.  I wasn’t…. The next three changes were business related. The changes will be voted on by my colleagues.  Steve Jobs of solving client problems the client didn’t know they had will be our guiding light.  I tried to change a few items. The obvious item what I changed was my eye  glasses.  The other areas were business related and I wanted wanted to be in control of my changes. The first change s our business’s model.  It has taken years to realize that I can’t beat thr market index.  Growing up on Wall Street this change was difficult.   Alpha is difficult to achieve an
Read more