Cottage Industry
The news last week that one
of the founding partners of Iconiq was leaving the firm emphasized how the
wealth management industry remains a cottage industry. Our blog this week will look at the pros and
cons of cottage industries. We will also
examine how a cottage industry can become an enduring industry that will
survive multiple generations. Is this a
goal advisors and their clients want and are they willing to make the necessary
changes? We believe it is worth
considering.
Cultive Personalities
Cottage industries promote the existence of big
personalities that define the company and insure the clients know what they are
getting if they work with the firm. Iconiq
has done a great job answering this question.
Is it the right answer for you?
The wealth management industry is very competitive forcing firms to
differentiate themselves from their competition. A big personality is a memorable
differentiator but it is ephemeral.
Brand
Most companies strive to create a brand. This will help your SEO and will ultimately increase
your firm’s value. Creating a brand is
easier said than done. Building a brand
starts with the firm’s executives and their marketing message. Most
established brands have defined their firm on the products they provide. New independent firms use other firm’s
products and differentiate themselves through their unique customer
service. Regulators have stepped into this
debate and characterize products under the Suitability
Standard and customer service under the Fiduciary
Standard. Some clients prefer great
products and others prefer great customer service.
Policies and
Procedures
Cottage industries are order takers. If the client wants a shirt you design and
deliver a shirt. The client is happy
until the designer/manufacturer leaves.
This is not the end of the world for the client but it is a nuisance to
find another person that they trust.
This reality created the need for firms to evolve from cottage industry
firms to brand name firms. Brand name
firms create policies and procedures to insure that clients know what to expect
when they do business with the firm.
Seems like an obvious goal but there are some unintended consequences of
branding. The biggest issue is who
owns the client?
We all have a question to answer. Do we want to be Charles Merrill [JS1] [JS2] [JS3] or
Charles Schwab? Not an easy question to answer. The markets have an answer.
Comments
Post a Comment